Pensions and the 'Ronseal effect'

Blogs

Pensions and the 'Ronseal effect'

Finance | David Davison | 7 Apr 2010

David Davison warns that those who are part of the Pensions Trust's 'Growth Plan' need to watch out for unexpected consequences.

There’s a trustworthy man who appears regularly on television promoting the merits of a well-known wood stain with the line “It does exactly what it says on the tin”. Unfortunately my recent experience with a pension scheme called the Growth Plan from the Pensions Trust has been far from as clear-cut.

There are a number of versions of the Growth Plan. Many of the charities who participate are blissfully unaware that a number of these potentially expose them to the risk of toxic final salary-related benefits when they thought they were funding purely on a defined contribution basis. There is therefore the potential for participants to have built up sizeable deficits within their scheme when they were unaware that this was the basis of the arrangement and that the payment of these deficits could be triggered inadvertently. Such triggers could include the organisation participating changing status, such as incorporation or merger, or if there were to be no longer any active members participating.

Participants need to be sure which version of the Growth Plan they participate in and if there are any additional liabilities which are building up and if so of what amount. The level of debt applicable is generally smaller than that which has built up in other, more high-profile schemes; however it can still be material for organisations, particularly those working within tight budgets.

You need to make sure your pension plan "does exactly what it says on the tin"!!

Directory: The Pensions Trust

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Name *

Email *

Organisation

Job Title

Comments *

Verification *

* Please read our Community Standards

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

Robust but respectful debate
Strongly held opinions
Intelligent relevant discussion
The sharing of relevant experiences
New participants

We will not publish:

Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
The posting of contact details for yourself or others
Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tags

Pensions

David is also director of Dalriada Trustees and Civil Society Media's dedicated pensions blogger.

Charities, pension schemes and the judgement of Solomon

Scottish Pensions - who will be the next to fold?

Pensions - avoiding Section 75 debt

Stable doors, shovels and a blueprint for change on the pension shortfall

YMCA pensions row referred to higher court

Protection from pensions

Disclose FRS17 or not disclose, that is the question?

In equities we trust

Longevity improvements more significant than credit crunch

Is your FRS17 deficit too high?

Pensions and charities are stuck between an ostrich and an elephant

Local authority three-card trick

Ian Allsop (41) David Davison (36) John Tate (32) Paul Bennett (22) Tania Mason (19) Gordon Hunter (17) Robert Ashton (15) Daniel Phelan (13) Gareth Jones (8) Vibeka Mair (6)

David Philpott (6) Celina Ribeiro (5) Andrew Hind (5) Niki May Young (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Andrew Chaggar (4) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Daniel Fletcher (2) Martin Brookes (2) Hal Broadbent (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Tim Brown (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Heather Lamont (1) Stephen Lloyd (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Peter Scott (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Paul Gibson (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Tesse Akpeki (1) Su Sayer (1) Martin Birch (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Sally O’Neill (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Nick Brooks (1) Nick Wilkie (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) Rob Dyson (1) Nick Cater (1) John May (1) Andy Williamson (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Neil Mapes (1) Dan Corry (1) Peter Holbrook (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Belinda Pratten (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Rui Domingues (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Ruchir Shah (1)

Less +++ More +++