Share

Expenses group must be above reproach

Expenses group must be above reproach
Blogs

Expenses group must be above reproach

Finance | Tania Mason | 14 Oct 2009

So Professor Paul Palmer, a member of the “independent” expert group that will issue guidance to charities on how they should report their expenses, also sits on the board of a company that stands to profit from sales of a new software tool that helps charities report their expenses.

And he doesn’t think there is anything wrong in this, because he told the other members of the board of Charity Business that he couldn’t discuss with them anything about his work with the expenses group. Because he declared his conflict of interest at the outset, there is nothing wrong with him holding down both posts, he contends.

I disagree. It just doesn’t smell right.  The marketing puff about Expense Solution on the Charity Business website makes overt references to the forthcoming guidance that Professor Palmer will help to write. References such as: “It has the ability to provide you with the level of reporting that might be needed when the consultation on charity expenses is completed in November” and: “Ensure you are fully compliant with the new disclosure requirements that might come out of the consultation”.

While there is no suggestion that Professor Palmer has deliberately tried to hide the truth about his dual roles, his position on an “independent” expert group becomes untenable if he has a financial interest in a company that is trying to profit from the guidance he will help to create.

The whole reason the expenses issue is on the table at all is because a whole lot of people in powerful positions, members of parliament no less, were found to be lining their pockets with cash that the public deemed they had acquired in an immoral way. The sector’s efforts to pre-empt and avoid any similar charges is to be applauded, and must not be allowed to be tainted by any hint of impropriety.  Professor Palmer must either resign his membership of the Charity Business board while he serves on the expenses group, or step down from the expenses group altogether.

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Tania Mason

Tania Mason is group editor at Civil Society Media. She has been a journalist for 20-odd years and has specialised in the charity sector since 2003.

Follow Tania on Twitter @taniamason

Ian Allsop (41) David Davison (36) John Tate (32) Paul Bennett (22) Tania Mason (19) Gordon Hunter (17) Robert Ashton (15) Daniel Phelan (13) Gareth Jones (8) Vibeka Mair (6) Less +++ More +++

Raspbery Pi - the future of computing

4 May 2012

John Tate introduces the new big thing in the world of computing.

Would you donate your desktop to charity?

4 May 2012

Would you hand your PC desktop background over to advertisers if it was fundraising for a good cause?...

A solution to regulating society lotteries

26 Apr 2012

Inspired by a debate between Joe Saxton and an employee of the Gambling Commission, David Philpott devises...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...