Who's to blame?

Who's to blame?

Who's to blame?

Finance | Lindsay Gray | 22 Aug 2008

Lindsay Gray wonders if there is an end to compensation fear. 

A recent civil damages case brought against a charity for injury to a climber at an activity centre has found in favour of the charity. The case, Trustees of the Portsmouth Youth Activities v Poppleton, sends a signal loud and clear to charities everywhere that they needn’t fear the compensation culture.

This case clearly signals that the courts are taking a much more measured and reasona-ble approach to cases for compensation. Just because an accident has happened, it doesn’t mean someone is at fault and it also doesn’t mean that someone can automatically be sued for compensation. Most accidents just happen, and some people who are the victims of accidents only have themselves to blame.

The case featured a climber who fell from a climbing wall in an activity centre. He wasn’t an experienced climber, and was given no formal training before taking part in the activity. However, this wasn’t within the responsibilities of the climbing centre. They were, like many other centres, “providing suitable premises and equipment and leaving it up to those using them to do so sensibly, and without supervision”.

The climber attempted to leap from a climbing wall to hang onto a girder and injured himself in the process. This was quite obviously a dangerous thing to do and the court highlighted the fact that: “The claimant’s acts are taken to be the sole source of harm”. As a result it was found that the charity was not obliged to pay any compensation.

Of course every charity has a duty of care to those people it works with. Where vulnerable people are concerned the responsibility can be great. In contrast, other duties, such as in the case above, are clearly defined and quite easy to demonstrate that you have fulfilled them.

This, however, is the crucial point. It doesn’t matter how simple your duty of care is, if you haven’t taken notice of it you will be liable for any accident. Not attending to an uneven floor in an office doesn’t sound like a big issue, but if someone has an accident it will easily be proven that you were responsible.

Another case underlines the importance of this issue yet further. It involved an accident on a bouncy castle during which an older child struck a much younger child causing him severe head injuries. The bouncy castle hire company made it very clear in their terms and conditions that the hirers of the castle held a responsibility to supervise children. The hire company were only responsible for erecting it safely. It was the parents hiring the castle who needed to do the supervising.

In this case the courts found against the parents and required them to pay the injured child compensation. Fortunately, the parent’s household policy provided liability cover and paid the claim. This case illustrates that in some cases there is a clear fault. Someone has a responsibility to keep people safe and either neglects or ignores this. They therefore then need to be held accountable.

However, where a responsible adult is the injured party the law takes a different view. Lord Justice May explains that: “there was no duty to explain the obvious to a consenting adult” and “there is, or should be, a policy of letting adults take care of themselves”. The climber knew there was a risk, this was clear. It was the climber who didn’t take the dangers seriously, not the charity. The Latin phrase ‘volenti non fit injura’ (to a willing person no injury is done) explains this perfectly.The ruling goes on to explain another important issue for charities: risk versus reward.

Up until now you could be forgiven for feeling that society is discouraging charities from doing anything at all. This ruling is a statement of common sense. It acknowledges that accidents do happen, and some-times no-one is to blame.

If charities use risk management and record their actions, they can clearly dem-onstrate that they are acting responsibly. Simple, well-documented steps are the best way to prevent accidents happening, and the best defence against damages claims too.

We shouldn’t take this case as an encouragement to disregard simple health and safety and risk management practices. But charities should remember that the fear of accidents should never stand in the way of their activities.


[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear


  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop (68) John Tate (58) David Davison (51) Robert Ashton (42) Tania Mason (24) Andrew Hind CB (23) Gordon Hunter (17) Daniel Phelan (15) David Ainsworth (14) Vibeka Mair (12)
David Philpott (10) Celina Ribeiro (8) Niki May Young (8) Rui Domingues (8) Andrew Chaggar (5) James Brooke Turner (4) Sir Stuart Etherington (4) Kate Sayer (3) Jeremy Swain (3) Garreth Spillane (3) Alistair Gibbons (3) Ian Clark (3) Claris D'cruz (2) Stephen Lloyd (2) Richard Maitland (2) Adrian Beney (2) Iain Pritchard (2) Pauline Broomhead (2) Martin Brookes (2) Tesse Akpeki (2) Nick Brooks (2) Stephen Hammersley (2) Geetha Rabindrakumar (2) June O'Sullivan (2) Kirsty Weakley (2) Dan Corry (2) Peter Holbrook (2) Belinda Pratten (2) Simon Steeden (2) Jonathan Bruck (2) Dan Gregory (2) Making Good: The Future of the Voluntary Sector (2) Mark Astarita (1) Don Bawtree (1) Sir Stephen Bubb (1) Victoria Cook (1) Lindsay Gray (1) Rachel Holmes (1) Nick Ivey (1) Iona Joy (1) John Kelly (1) Michael King (1) Heather Lamont (1) Lucy McLynn (1) Chris Oulton (1) Julian Rathbone (1) Socrates Socratous (1) Richard Weaver (1) Karl Wilding (1) Richard Williams (1) Roger Chester (1) Matthew Bowcock (1) Joe Saxton (1) Reuben Turner (1) Martin Farrell (1) Paul Gibson (1) Jonathon Grapsas (1) Andrew Scadding (1) Simon Hebditch (1) Su Sayer (1) Debra Allcock Tyler (1) Martin Birch (1) Mark Hallam (1) Jonathan Lewis (1) Sara Llewellin (1) John Low (1) Dame Mary Marsh (1) Ruth Murphy (1) Colin Nee (1) Julia Unwin (1) Kate Rogers (1) Malcolm Hayday (1) Filippo Addarii (1) Kimberley Scharf (1) Jakes Ferguson (1) Jessica Sklair (1) Joe Turner (1) John May (1) Julian Blake (1) Rosie Chapman (1) Andy Williamson (1) Malcolm Hurlston (1) Andrew Samuel (1) Chester Mojay-Sinclare (1) Paul Amadi (1) Luke Fletcher (1) Peter Mitchell (1) Billy Dove (1) Andrew Ketteringham (1) Jackie Turpin (1) Lynne Robb (1) Jonathan Crown (1) Paul Emery (1) Ruchir Shah (1) Pesh Framjee (1) Sukhvinder Kaur-Stubbs (1) Moira Protani (1) Vicki Prout (1) Michael O'Toole (1) Dawn Austwick (1) Lisa Clavering (1) Paul Farmer (1) Neelam Makhijani (1) Logan Anderson (1) Andy Rich (1) Sharon Martin (1) Asheem Singh (1) Leigh Daynes (1) Abdurahman Sharif (1) Lynne McMahon (1) Richard Caulfield (1) Carolyn Sims (1) Ashley Horsey (1) Andrew O'Brien (1)
Less +++ More +++

Ten tips for digital transformation at charities

27 May 2015

Last week Kirsty Weakley spent a day immersed in all things digital transformation at CharityComms' conference....

Social Charity Spy: Charities’ online response to the Nepal Earthquake

1 May 2015

The Disasters Emergency Committee, ActionAid and Save the Children have been making full use of social...

Technology lessons from down the ages

1 May 2015

Holiday technology frustrations remind John Tate of some important IT rules.

Society Diary: Duck lanes on the towpath and the lamest excuses for late filing

22 May 2015

Our weekly round-up of outlandish and interesting information collected from the corners of the charity...

The voluntary sector needs to fight for the Human Rights Act

21 May 2015

The government’s attempts to repeal the Human Rights Act is not just a problem for civil liberties charities...

The coalition and the charity sector: what were the highs and lows?

7 May 2015

The coalition government draws to a close today, following five years in which it has often had a turbulent...