Share

Too close for comfort?

Socrates Socratous, director, SOC VAT Consultants
Blogs

Too close for comfort?

Finance | Socrates Socratous | 12 Jan 2012

HMRC's new dispute resolution service would instil more confidence if the facilitators were independent, says Socrates Socratous.

Only time will tell if HMRC's new Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service is useful.

Much will depend on whether the facilitators are truly independent and give unbiased guidance/comment to a dispute, or whether they take the side of HMRC. At the moment, once an officer has reached a decision on a matter, the taxpayer can ask for a review of the decision by an officer who has not been involved in the decision. However, our experience and that of many others is that the review officer will uphold the decision of the original officer. Similarly, it is not unknown for the review officer to liaise with the decision-making officer, thus bringing into question whether the review is truly independent.

Whether this new pilot will be any better remains to be seen. The theory sounds fine, but would HMRC really invest time and effort if the net result is less assessments?

The overarching problem for small taxpayers is that HMRC knows full well that if an assessment of anything up to £30,000 is issued, most taxpayers will not now fight it in the Tribunal because even if they win, they do not receive reimbursement of costs and hence are still out of pocket – unlike the historic position. In my opinion, this fundamental change to the Tribunal appeals process does no favours to small businesses as HMRC has a clear advantage.

Having said this, the theory sounds fine but the jury is out, pending how HMRC operates ADR. I would have felt more comfortable with the proposals if the facilitators were independent of HMRC and had received relevant training to consider VAT matters.

Socrates Socratous is director at SOC VAT Consultants

Comments

[Cancel] | Reply to:

Close »

Community Standards

The civilsociety.co.uk community and comments board is intended as a platform for informed and civilised debate.

We hope to encourage a broad range of views, however, there are standards that we expect commentators to uphold. We reserve the right to delete or amend any comments that do not adhere to these standards.

We welcome:

  • Robust but respectful debate
  • Strongly held opinions
  • Intelligent relevant discussion
  • The sharing of relevant experiences
  • New participants

We will not publish:

  • Rude, threatening, offensive, obscene or abusive language, or links to such material
  • Links to commercial organisations or spam postings. The comments board is not an advertising platform
  • The posting of contact details for yourself or others
  • Comments intended for malicious purpose or mindless abuse
  • Comments purporting to be from another person or organisation under false pretences
  • Gratuitous criticism, commentary or self-promotion
  • Any material which breaches copyright or privacy laws, or could be considered libellous
  • The use of the comments board for the pursuit or extension of personal disputes

Be aware:

  • Views expressed on the comments board are left at users’ discretion and are in no way views held or supported by Civil Society Media
  • Comments left by others may not be accurate, do not rely on them as fact
  • You may be misunderstood - sarcasm and humour can easily be taken out of context, try to be clear

Please:

  • Enjoy the opportunity to express your opinion and respect the right of others to express theirs
  • Confine your remarks to issues rather than personalities

Together we can keep our community a polite, respectful and intelligent platform for discussion.

Ian Allsop (41) David Davison (36) John Tate (32) Paul Bennett (22) Tania Mason (19) Gordon Hunter (17) Robert Ashton (15) Daniel Phelan (13) Gareth Jones (8) Vibeka Mair (6) Less +++ More +++

Raspbery Pi - the future of computing

4 May 2012

John Tate introduces the new big thing in the world of computing.

Would you donate your desktop to charity?

4 May 2012

Would you hand your PC desktop background over to advertisers if it was fundraising for a good cause?...

A solution to regulating society lotteries

26 Apr 2012

Inspired by a debate between Joe Saxton and an employee of the Gambling Commission, David Philpott devises...

Carrot and stick

21 May 2012

Community isn't led by government, so why wait for it to tell you what to do, protests Robert Ashton....

Two tribes - when male panelists meet female campaigners

17 May 2012

Men may have ruled the political panel, but women packed the punches from the audience in the Civil Society...

Timeline: Coalition government so far

14 May 2012

It’s two years since Britain voted in the previously unlikely coalition of the Conservatives and Liberal...